there’s nothing we women can’t be

Nothing I have written today makes much of a statement. Sometimes there are just days like this.

+ I have a pretty small carbon footprint, about 1/5 of the national average, which I feel pretty good about. I wonder how much of this is due to the fact that I do not own a car.

+ Via Jezebel, how great is this?

+ Some writing things. This post on Jenny Crusie’s blog got me thinking about what constitutes a romance novel. (My friend T says, though, that, if you can take the romance plot out of a novel and still have a story, it’s not a romance. Hmm.) Also, men read romance.

+ Check out these awesome fashions from 1928!

+ I have acquired a KINDLE!

it’s almost november already

That’s right, bitches. It’s time to write a novel. This year, I have a nefarious plan to write the most ridiculous suspense novel ever, with way too many characters and a hero who moonlights as a paid assassin. I’m psyched.

quickies: it’s gettin’ hot in herre edition

+ The Hamilton Grange, historical house of Alexander Hamilton, is getting moved.

+ Barack Obama makes a best-dressed list.

+ Local activism! Feminist groups in NY.

+ Also local, Let Governor Paterson know you support marriage equality.

+ The Decline of Times Square. No, not forty years ago. Now.

+ Dear Author has an interesting discussion of our odd deference to people with Ivy League educations. For the record, I’m good enough and smart enough, etc, etc, and probably could have gotten into an Ivy but didn’t have the funds. I instead have a BA from a big public university, and I’m doing just fine, thanks. No doubt, an Ivy League education is no small achievement, but it’s not necessarily a safe assessment that all Ivy grads are automatically skilled at whatever. Right?

+ Need another reason to vote against McCain. He’s affiliated with the sorts of pro-lifers who want to take away condoms, too.

+ Bridesmaid culture. Of interest mostly because I’m in the midst of a wedding season myself, and thankfully all the brides I know are smart, level-headed women, but still: the horror stories I’ve heard of women who have gone crazy when their weddings came around. Why does this happen? What the hell is wrong with the bridal industry?

+ People in my home state of NJ are legally prevented from pumping their own gas. Here’s why. Short version: Lawmakers think Jerseyans are stupid.

+ You’ve already heard about the terrorist fist bump.

+ The Rude Pundit makes some campaign predictions.

+ Krugman talks about eBooks. Wave of the future? Sure seems that way. I still prefer paper books, myself.

quickies: wait, when was the last time I posted? edition

+ New research indicates female brains process language differently, thus girls are better at language arts. I find the study interesting; I did some research in college that convinced me that boys and girls are socialized to succeed in certain skill areas, and I still think this is true, but it’s interesting also to think there’s a biological mechanism for girls excelling at language. (Of course, you don’t see action figures that say, “Words are hard!“)

+ The CEO of Lego doesn’t get why they can’t appeal more to girls. I’ll tell you why. It’s because parents buy them for boys. I owned not a single Lego as a kid, but I played with my brother’s. A lot.

+ There’s a guy who created the Typo Eradication Advancement League, to stomp out typos on street signs around the country. Can I join?

+ We at the fshk blog love Patrick Swayze and thus are saddened by the news that he may have terminal pancreatic cancer. Gawker has compiled some of his greatest cinematic moments. Hey, nobody puts baby in the corner!

soldiers and trauma

In December, I started writing a novel about a man who comes home from the war in Iraq and starts kidnapping and murdering young girls. It sort of grew into the piece about the after-effects of war. Timely of me to start it, then, since soldiers and PTSD and homicide were big news last week.

I’ve been compiling articles and blog posts on the issue, so here’s what I’ve collected so far:

Last week’s Times magazine story. That soldiers commit homicide is not really news. My interest in the story is about the why. What happens to these men (and women) when they are overseas that makes them unable to reintegrate into society, to make them think it’s necessary to carry an assault rifle to 7-11.

From the article:

“He came back different” is the shared refrain of the defendants’ family members, who mention irritability, detachment, volatility, sleeplessness, excessive drinking or drug use, and keeping a gun at hand.

“You are unleashing certain things in a human being we don’t allow in civic society, and getting it all back in the box can be difficult for some people,” said William C. Gentry, an Army reservist and Iraq veteran who works as a prosecutor in San Diego County.

The nature of the counterinsurgency war in Iraq, where there is no traditional front line, has amplified the stresses of combat, and multiple tours of duty — a third of the troops involved in Iraq and Afghanistan have deployed more than once — ratchet up those stresses.

In earlier eras, various labels attached to the psychological injuries of war: soldier’s heart, shell shock, Vietnam disorder. Today the focus is on PTSD, but military health care officials are seeing a spectrum of psychological issues, with an estimated half of the returning National Guard members, 38 percent of soldiers and 31 percent of marines reporting mental health problems, according to a Pentagon task force.

Decades of studies on the problems of Vietnam veterans have established links between combat trauma and higher rates of unemployment, homelessness, gun ownership, child abuse, domestic violence, substance abuse — and criminality. On a less scientific level, such links have long been known.

The problem here is that there’s insufficient screening for mental-health problems when soldiers get home, and there’s not enough support or follow-up care.

Blogger reactions:

Amanda at Pandagon: “While the murders themselves are an important story, the larger story here is that war—and wars that are primarily about shutting down civilian resistance like the Iraq War is—leave many more casualties than the ones officially logged by the government.”

Samhita at Feministing: “If we haven’t already exhausted the reasons for why we should not be at war right now, let this be one of the issues that comes to the forefront of national attention.”

The Mahablog: On the rightie blogger reaction.

I = slacker

Resolution: To find more blogging time!

I have lately been reading a lot of author blogs, and I like this idea of writing about writing, so you might see more of that soon. I’ve got a lot of disparate threads of novels in the works right now: a romance novel, a suspense thriller, a big sprawling mainstream fiction epic, a couple of historical things.

Maybe I’ll also talk about politics. (This is likely. Look, Edwards is leading in Iowa. Yay!) Maybe I’ll talk about pets or knitting. (For example, my page-a-day calendar tells me today that the first mass-published knitting patterns first appeared in women’s magazines in 1840.)

Anyway, I hope to actually, you know, maintain the blog this year. Stay tuned.

Bad Behavior has blocked 73 access attempts in the last 7 days.